Standing

SCOTUS: Plaintiffs lack standing in social-media coercion case (Murthy v. Missouri)

2024-06-26 00:00:00 +0000 UTC | Importance: 6/10

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 26, 2024, that neither state nor individual plaintiffs established standing to enjoin federal officials over alleged coercion of social-media platforms. Justice Barrett’s majority opinion found plaintiffs failed to show government actions caused platforms to …

Supreme Court of the United States Justice Amy Coney Barrett (majority opinion) Justice Samuel Alito (dissent) Justice Clarence Thomas (dissent) Justice Neil Gorsuch (dissent) +2 more courts social-media standing first-amendment content-moderation +3 more

SCOTUS: No standing in challenge to mifepristone changes (FDA v. AHM)

2024-06-13 00:00:00 +0000 UTC | Importance: 6/10

The Supreme Court unanimously held the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing to challenge FDA’s 2016/2021 actions on mifepristone, leaving the agency’s changes in place. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion, with the Court finding that the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine failed to …

Supreme Court of the United States Food and Drug Administration administrative-law courts standing supreme-court abortion-rights