Judicial-Oversight

7th Circuit Blocks Release of 615 Immigrants One Day Before Court-Ordered Deadline

| Importance: 9/10

On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted an emergency administrative stay blocking the release of up to 615 immigrants detained in the Chicago area, just one day before they were scheduled to be freed under a federal district court order. The appellate …

7th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey Cummings Trump Administration Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) +2 more judicial-oversight appeals-court immigration-enforcement consent-decree operation-midway-blitz +4 more
Read more →

Federal Court Orders Unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein Case Documents

| Importance: 8/10

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska orders the unsealing of documents from Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell, including depositions and court filings that had been sealed for years. The order affects approximately 180 individuals mentioned in the documents, …

Loretta Preska Virginia Giuffre Ghislaine Maxwell Miami Herald Julie Brown document-unsealing transparency media-litigation public-interest judicial-oversight
Read more →

Federal Judge Overturns Sackler Immunity Deal, Rules Bankruptcy Law Violated

| Importance: 8/10

On December 16, 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon overturned the controversial bankruptcy settlement that would have granted the Sackler family immunity from opioid-related lawsuits in exchange for $4.5 billion. Judge McMahon ruled that bankruptcy courts do not have the authority to …

Colleen McMahon Sackler Family Purdue Pharma U.S. Department of Justice opioid-crisis bankruptcy-law judicial-oversight accountability legal-precedent
Read more →

Federal Judge Rules Epstein Plea Deal Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act

| Importance: 8/10

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra rules that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act by failing to inform victims about the 2008 non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. The ruling found that prosecutors deliberately concealed the agreement from victims and their …

Kenneth Marra Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell Alexander Acosta Jeffrey Epstein judicial-oversight victim-rights-violations prosecutorial-misconduct transparency rule-of-law
Read more →

Second Circuit Rules NSA Bulk Phone Metadata Collection Illegal Under Patriot Act

| Importance: 9/10

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously ruled in ACLU v. Clapper that the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephone metadata was not authorized by Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, effectively declaring the surveillance program …

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Gerard Lynch NSA ACLU nsa-surveillance judicial-oversight patriot-act section-215 privacy-rights +1 more
Read more →

Federal Judge Rules NSA Bulk Phone Data Collection Likely Unconstitutional

| Importance: 9/10

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon ruled in Klayman v. Obama that the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of American telephone metadata likely violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. In a strongly-worded 68-page opinion, Judge Leon …

Richard Leon NSA Larry Klayman nsa-surveillance fourth-amendment judicial-oversight constitutional-law privacy-rights
Read more →

Hans von Spakovsky Overrules DOJ Career Staff to Approve Georgia Voter ID Law Targeting Black Voters

| Importance: 8/10

Hans von Spakovsky, serving as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, led the department’s approval of Georgia’s controversial photo ID law in August 2005 despite unanimous objections from career Justice Department attorneys and …

Hans von Spakovsky Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Georgia Legislature Harold Murphy Career DOJ Attorneys voter-suppression voting-rights-act doj-politicization civil-rights-rollback judicial-oversight +2 more
Read more →

Supreme Court Rules 8-0 in United States v. Nixon: President Must Surrender Tapes

| Importance: 10/10

On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 8-0 decision in United States v. Nixon, ordering President Richard Nixon to deliver sixty-four tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials related to the Watergate scandal to the federal district court. Chief Justice Warren Burger—a Nixon …

Supreme Court Warren Burger Richard Nixon Leon Jaworski Harry Blackmun +2 more watergate judicial-oversight rule-of-law executive-power constitutional-law
Read more →

Judge Sirica Uses Maximum Sentences to Break Watergate Cover-up, McCord Writes Explosive Letter

| Importance: 9/10

U.S. District Judge John Joseph Sirica, known as “Maximum John” for giving defendants the stiffest sentences guidelines allowed, presided over the trial of the Watergate burglars with deep skepticism about their claims of acting alone. Sirica employed an innovative strategy of …

John Sirica James W. McCord Jr. G. Gordon Liddy John Dean John N. Mitchell watergate obstruction-of-justice judicial-oversight institutional-corruption abuse-of-power
Read more →