Judicial-Capture

Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Child Labor Law in Hammer v. Dagenhart

| Importance: 8/10

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916 on June 3, 1918, in Hammer v. Dagenhart, ruling 5-4 that the federal law exceeded federal authority and represented an unwarranted encroachment on state powers to determine local labor conditions. Justice William R. …

U.S. Supreme Court Justice William R. Day Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. supreme-court child-labor labor-rights judicial-capture progressive-era
Read more →

Hitchman Coal v. Mitchell: Supreme Court Authorizes Injunctions to Enforce Yellow-Dog Contracts

| Importance: 7/10

The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could issue injunctions against union organizing efforts at workplaces where employees had signed yellow-dog contracts, dramatically expanding the legal weapons available to employers. Justice Mahlon Pitney’s 6-3 majority opinion held that union …

Supreme Court of the United States Justice Mahlon Pitney United Mine Workers of America Hitchman Coal and Coke Company labor-suppression judicial-capture progressive-era yellow-dog-contracts injunctions
Read more →

Buck's Stove Case: Gompers, Mitchell, Morrison Sentenced for Contempt, Boycotts Criminalized

| Importance: 7/10

A federal court sentenced AFL President Samuel Gompers to one year in prison, Vice President John Mitchell to nine months, and Secretary Frank Morrison to six months for contempt of court in the Buck’s Stove and Range Company boycott case. The case exemplified how federal courts had become …

Samuel Gompers John Mitchell Frank Morrison American Federation of Labor Buck's Stove and Range Company +1 more labor-suppression judicial-capture progressive-era antitrust injunctions
Read more →

Muller v. Oregon: Brandeis Brief Upholds Women's Labor Protections Using Paternalistic Reasoning

| Importance: 7/10

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld an Oregon law limiting women’s workdays to ten hours in Muller v. Oregon, creating a narrow exception to the anti-labor Lochner doctrine. Attorney Louis Brandeis filed a revolutionary 113-page brief containing only two pages of legal argument and over 100 …

Supreme Court of the United States Louis Brandeis Curt Muller Oregon Legislature National Consumers League labor-rights judicial-capture progressive-era gender-discrimination working-conditions
Read more →

Supreme Court Loewe v. Lawlor Decision Holds Union Members Personally Liable for Damages

| Importance: 8/10

The U.S. Supreme Court rules unanimously 9-0 in Loewe v. Lawlor (the “Danbury Hatters’ Case”) that the Sherman Antitrust Act applies to labor unions and that individual union members can be held personally liable for damages caused by union boycotts. Chief Justice Melville W. …

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Melville W. Fuller United Hatters of North America D.E. Loewe & Company Martin Lawlor +1 more labor-suppression gilded-age supreme-court antitrust-misuse judicial-capture +1 more
Read more →

Adair v. United States: Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Ban on Yellow-Dog Contracts

| Importance: 7/10

The Supreme Court struck down Section 10 of the Erdman Act, which prohibited railroads engaged in interstate commerce from requiring workers to sign “yellow-dog contracts” - agreements not to join labor unions as a condition of employment. Justice John Marshall Harlan, who had dissented …

Supreme Court of the United States Justice John Marshall Harlan William Adair Louisville and Nashville Railroad labor-suppression judicial-capture progressive-era yellow-dog-contracts railroad-labor
Read more →

Supreme Court Strikes Down Labor Protections in Lochner v. New York

| Importance: 9/10

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Lochner v. New York on April 17, 1905, striking down a New York law that limited bakery workers to a 60-hour work week as unconstitutional. Justice Rufus Peckham’s majority opinion held that the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due …

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Rufus Peckham Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Justice John Harlan Joseph Lochner supreme-court labor-rights corporate-power judicial-capture progressive-era +1 more
Read more →

Supreme Court In Re Debs Decision Upholds Federal Injunctions Against Strikes

| Importance: 9/10

The U.S. Supreme Court issues a unanimous 9-0 decision in In re Debs, upholding the federal government’s use of injunctions to suppress labor strikes and affirming Eugene V. Debs’s contempt of court conviction for continuing the 1894 Pullman Strike in violation of a federal court order. …

U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Josiah Brewer Eugene V. Debs Federal judiciary Corporate interests labor-suppression gilded-age judicial-capture injunction supreme-court +1 more
Read more →

U.S. v. E.C. Knight: Supreme Court Shields Sugar Trust and Eviscerates Antitrust Law

| Importance: 9/10

On January 21, 1895, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. E.C. Knight Co. (156 U.S. 1) by a vote of 8-1, effectively gutting the Sherman Antitrust Act just five years after its passage. The case arose when the American Sugar Refining Company (the “Sugar Trust”) acquired four …

U.S. Supreme Court Melville Fuller American Sugar Refining Company E.C. Knight Company Grover Cleveland Administration judicial-capture regulatory-erosion monopoly-power corporate-impunity supreme-court
Read more →

Civil Rights Cases Strike Down 1875 Act, Legitimizing Jim Crow

| Importance: 10/10

The Supreme Court declares the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional in an 8-1 decision, ruling that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments do not empower Congress to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals—thereby legitimizing the Jim Crow system of racial segregation that will …

U.S. Supreme Court Joseph P. Bradley John Marshall Harlan judicial-capture civil-rights-destruction reconstruction-sabotage institutional-racism white-supremacy
Read more →

United States v. Cruikshank Guts Federal Civil Rights Enforcement

| Importance: 10/10

The Supreme Court unanimously overturns the federal convictions of Colfax Massacre perpetrators in United States v. Cruikshank, ruling that the Bill of Rights does not limit private actors or state governments despite the Fourteenth Amendment—effectively destroying federal power to protect Black …

U.S. Supreme Court Joseph P. Bradley Colfax Massacre Perpetrators judicial-capture reconstruction-sabotage civil-rights-destruction white-supremacy institutional-capture
Read more →

Susan B. Anthony Arrested for Voting in Presidential Election Tests 14th Amendment

| Importance: 8/10

On November 5, 1872, Susan B. Anthony voted in the presidential election between Ulysses S. Grant and his opponent in Rochester, New York, along with 14 other women, in a deliberate act of civil disobedience designed to test whether the 14th Amendment granted women voting rights as citizens. Four …

Susan B. Anthony Ward Hunt John Van Voorhis Sylvester Lewis Ulysses S. Grant womens-suffrage judicial-capture civil-disobedience constitutional-law democratic-exclusion
Read more →

Midnight Judges Act Enables Lame-Duck Court Packing by Defeated Federalists

| Importance: 8/10

President John Adams signs the Judiciary Act of 1801 less than three weeks before the end of his term and the Federalist majority in Congress, expanding the federal judiciary by creating sixteen new circuit court judgeships and reducing the Supreme Court from six to five justices. After losing the …

President John Adams Federalist Party U.S. Senate William Marbury judicial-capture court-packing lame-duck-power institutional-manipulation political-corruption
Read more →