Fourteenth-Amendment

Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta Railroad v. Gibbes: Corporate Personhood Reaffirmed

| Importance: 6/10

The Supreme Court again explicitly affirmed corporate personhood, holding that “It is again decided that private corporations are persons within the meaning of [the Fourteenth] Amendment.” The case involved South Carolina’s requirement that railroads pay the salaries and expenses …

U.S. Supreme Court Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta Railroad Company South Carolina Legislature State Railroad Commission corporate-personhood supreme-court fourteenth-amendment railroad-regulation due-process
Read more →

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Beckwith: Corporate Personhood Doctrine Becomes Settled Law

| Importance: 7/10

The Supreme Court formally declared corporate personhood as settled constitutional law, with Justice Stephen Field writing that “Corporations are persons within the meaning of the clauses in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution concerning the deprivation of property, and concerning the …

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company corporate-personhood supreme-court fourteenth-amendment due-process equal-protection +1 more
Read more →

Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania: Court Explicitly Affirms Corporate Personhood

| Importance: 8/10

In an 8-0 decision authored by Justice Stephen Field, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly affirmed corporate personhood under the Fourteenth Amendment, holding that “Under the designation of ‘person’ there is no doubt that a private corporation is included. Such corporations are …

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining and Milling Company Commonwealth of Pennsylvania corporate-personhood supreme-court fourteenth-amendment due-process corporate-rights
Read more →

Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad: The Corporate Personhood Precedent That Never Was

| Importance: 10/10

In what would become one of the most consequential non-rulings in American legal history, a court reporter’s headnote to Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad established the foundation for corporate personhood without the Supreme Court ever deciding the issue. Before oral arguments, …

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Morrison Waite J.C. Bancroft Davis (Court Reporter) Southern Pacific Railroad Santa Clara County +1 more corporate-personhood supreme-court fourteenth-amendment constitutional-law gilded-age +3 more
Read more →

Roscoe Conkling's Fraudulent Argument for Corporate Personhood in San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific

| Importance: 9/10

Former U.S. Senator Roscoe Conkling, who had twice refused Supreme Court appointments to pursue his lucrative Gilded Age law practice, argued before the Court in San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific Railroad that the Fourteenth Amendment’s framers intentionally used “person” rather …

Roscoe Conkling U.S. Supreme Court Southern Pacific Railroad San Mateo County Joint Committee on Reconstruction corporate-personhood supreme-court fourteenth-amendment legal-corruption gilded-age +2 more
Read more →