The Senate confirmed Rebecca Taibleson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by a vote of 52-46, filling the seat vacated by Judge Diane Sykes who assumed senior status on October 1, 2025. Taibleson, who served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, …
Donald TrumpRebecca TaiblesonRon JohnsonTammy BaldwinU.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit+1 moreappeals-courtcourtsjudicial-appointmentsjudiciary
The Senate confirmed multiple Trump nominees to Alabama federal district courts in late October 2025, continuing the administration’s systematic reshaping of the federal judiciary. On October 21, Harold D. Mooty III was confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama …
Alabama Federal CourtsBill LewisDonald TrumpHarold D. Mooty IIIU.S. Senatealabamacourtsdistrict-courtjudicial-appointmentsjudiciary
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 to overturn a district court order blocking President Trump’s deployment of approximately 200 Oregon National Guard troops to protect a Portland ICE facility. Circuit Judges Ryan D. Nelson and Bridget S. Bade …
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDonald TrumpOregon National GuardKarin ImmergutRyan D. Nelson+2 morejudiciarycourtsappeals-courtnational-guardexecutive-power+2 more
The Supreme Court heard rare second-round oral arguments in Louisiana v. Callais, a case that could fundamentally weaken or eliminate Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The case questions whether Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district (which elected Rep. …
Supreme CourtLouisianaACLUNAACP Legal Defense FundCleo Fieldssupreme-courtjudiciarycourtsvoting-rightsredistricting+2 more
The Senate confirmed Jennifer Mascott to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit by a vote of 50-47, marking Trump’s second appointee to this circuit in his second term. Mascott, a Catholic University law professor and former Trump White House lawyer, founded the Separation of Powers …
Jennifer MascottU.S. SenateU.S. Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitDonald TrumpFederalist Societyjudiciaryjudicial-appointmentscourtsappeals-courtjudicial-capture+1 more
The Supreme Court began its 2025-2026 term on October 6, 2025, with a docket featuring critical cases on executive power, voting rights, and constitutional law. The October session includes 10 oral arguments over five days, with several cases that could fundamentally reshape American governance.
Key …
Supreme CourtJohn RobertsConservative Majoritysupreme-courtjudiciarycourtsexecutive-powervoting-rights+1 more
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a rush appeal deciding whether President Trump acted lawfully in firing board members leading independent federal agencies, setting up oral arguments for December 2025. The case will reconsider the landmark 1935 precedent Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, …
Supreme CourtDonald TrumpRebecca SlaughterFederal Trade CommissionBrett Kavanaughsupreme-courtjudiciarycourtsexecutive-powerindependent-agencies+3 more
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mixed ruling in NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta, largely upholding California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act (SB 976) while striking down one provision. The decision affirmed a district court’s denial of …
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNetChoiceCaliforniaRob Bontajudiciarycourtsappeals-courtsocial-mediatech-regulation+2 more
The Trump administration filed an expedited emergency petition with the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the Federal Circuit’s August 29 ruling that declared Trump’s sweeping tariffs illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The government asked the Court to …
Donald TrumpSupreme CourtU.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDepartment of Justicesupreme-courtjudiciarycourtsemergency-docketexecutive-power+2 more
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 7-4 that President Trump unlawfully exceeded his emergency powers authority when imposing sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The full court held that Trump’s ‘reciprocal tariffs’ …
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDonald TrumpSupreme Courtjudiciarycourtsappeals-courtexecutive-powertariffs+2 more
The New York Appellate Division, in a unanimous five-judge decision, threw out the $527 million civil fraud judgment against President Donald Trump and his companies, ruling the penalty was “excessive” and violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines. The appeals …
New York State Appellate DivisionDonald TrumpTrump OrganizationLetitia JamesArthur Engoron+2 moreFinancial FraudNY Attorney GeneralTrump OrganizationAppeals CourtEighth Amendment+2 more
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on July 11, 2025, prohibiting LAPD from using less-lethal munitions, rubber bullets, and chemical agents against clearly identified journalists covering protests in Los Angeles. The order also bars police from forcibly removing journalists from …
U.S. District CourtLAPDJournalistspress-freedomcourtsprotestsfirst-amendmentpolice-violence+2 more
Three-judge panel (2 Trump, 1 Biden appointees) unanimously grants stay after Judge Breyer ruled deployment exceeded authority. Court finds ‘colorable basis’ under Title 10 for 4,100 Guard troops and 700 Marines in LA. Rules governors have no veto power over federal deployment. Case …
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuitcivil-militarycourtsemergency-powers
A federal district judge in Northern California ruled on June 12, 2025, that the Trump administration’s federalization of California National Guard and deployment of 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles likely violated the Posse Comitatus Act and principles of federalism. The judge found the …
U.S. District Court (N.D. Cal.)State of CaliforniaGovernor Gavin NewsomDepartment of Defense2nd Battalion, 7th Marines+2 morecivil-militarycourtsemergency-powersposse-comitatusfederalism+2 more
A federal judge on April 8, 2025, ordered the White House to restore Associated Press access to cover presidential events, finding that the administration’s February ban constituted viewpoint-based discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. The ruling came after AP was barred from …
U.S. District CourtAssociated PressThe White HouseTrump Administrationcourtspress-freedomfirst-amendmentmedia-accessassociated-press+1 more
The White House blocked AP reporters from pooled access on Feb. 11 amid a naming dispute over the Gulf of Mexico (“Gulf of America”), with administration stating it has the right to punish AP reporters. On Apr. 8, a federal district court ordered access restored, finding viewpoint …
President Trump fired Hampton Dellinger from his position as head of the Office of Special Counsel via email on Friday night, February 7, 2025, stating simply “your position…is terminated, effective immediately.” Dellinger immediately sued, arguing his removal violated statutory …
Donald TrumpHampton Dellinger (Special Counsel)Office of Special Counsel (OSC)Judge Amy Berman JacksonU.S. Senate (confirmed Dellinger 2024)courtspersonnelwatchdogswhistleblower-protectionfor-cause-removal+2 more
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, eliminating the long-standing doctrine that required courts to defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This landmark ruling fundamentally reshapes administrative law, requiring courts to …
Supreme Court of the United StatesChief Justice John RobertsNational Marine Fisheries Serviceadministrative-lawchevroncourtssupreme-courtjudicial-reform
The Supreme Court granted a 5-4 stay on June 27, 2024, blocking the EPA’s Good Neighbor Plan addressing interstate ozone pollution while litigation proceeds. Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion found EPA failed to reasonably explain its methodology after some states left the program. The …
Supreme Court of the United StatesEPAJustice Neil Gorsuch (majority opinion)Justice Amy Coney Barrett (dissent)State of Ohio (applicant)+2 moreadministrative-lawcourtsenvironmentclean-air-actgood-neighbor-provision+3 more
In a 6-3 decision on June 27, 2024, the Court held the Seventh Amendment requires jury trials when the SEC seeks civil penalties for securities fraud, ending the agency’s use of in-house administrative law judge proceedings for such cases. Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion found …
Supreme Court of the United StatesSecurities and Exchange CommissionChief Justice John Roberts (majority opinion)Justice Neil Gorsuch (concurring)Justice Clarence Thomas (concurring)+4 moreadministrative-lawcourtsenforcementseventh-amendmentjury-trial-rights+3 more
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 26, 2024, that neither state nor individual plaintiffs established standing to enjoin federal officials over alleged coercion of social-media platforms. Justice Barrett’s majority opinion found plaintiffs failed to show government actions caused platforms to …
Supreme Court of the United StatesJustice Amy Coney Barrett (majority opinion)Justice Samuel Alito (dissent)Justice Clarence Thomas (dissent)Justice Neil Gorsuch (dissent)+2 morecourtssocial-mediastandingfirst-amendmentcontent-moderation+3 more
The Supreme Court unanimously held the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing to challenge FDA’s 2016/2021 actions on mifepristone, leaving the agency’s changes in place. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion, with the Court finding that the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine failed to …
Supreme Court of the United StatesFood and Drug Administrationadministrative-lawcourtsstandingsupreme-courtabortion-rights