Constitutional-Law

Supreme Court Begins 2025-2026 Term with Focus on Executive Power and Voting Rights

| Importance: 8/10

The Supreme Court began its 2025-2026 term on October 6, 2025, with a docket featuring critical cases on executive power, voting rights, and constitutional law. The October session includes 10 oral arguments over five days, with several cases that could fundamentally reshape American governance.

Key …

Supreme Court John Roberts Conservative Majority supreme-court judiciary courts executive-power voting-rights +1 more
Read more →

Brookings warns on legal limits of putting soldiers on Los Angeles streets

| Importance: 6/10

Brookings June 26, 2025, analysis warned Trump’s deployment of 700 Marines and 4,000 federalized National Guard to LA violates Posse Comitatus Act. Trump invoked 10 USC §12406 (not Insurrection Act) claiming “inherent constitutional authority” to protect federal property. …

Brookings Institution Legal scholars Department of Defense Department of Homeland Security Trump Administration analysis civil-military insurrection-act posse-comitatus legal-analysis +2 more
Read more →

Supreme Court Rejects Dangerous "Independent State Legislature" Theory in Moore v. Harper

| Importance: 6/10

Supreme Court rejected dangerous “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper with 6-3 decision, preserving state courts’ ability to review federal election laws under state constitutions. Theory would have given state legislatures unchecked power over federal …

US Supreme Court North Carolina Legislature Democracy advocates independent-state-legislature supreme-court election-law constitutional-law checks-and-balances +1 more
Read more →

Second Impeachment Trial Begins with Constitutional Debate on Trying Former President

| Importance: 9/10

The Senate’s second impeachment trial of Donald Trump began on February 9, 2021, with a four-hour constitutional debate centered on the fundamental question: can the Senate try a former president? In a 56-44 vote, the Senate affirmed that the trial was constitutional and could proceed, with …

Donald Trump Patrick Leahy Bruce Castor David Schoen Michael van der Veen +2 more Impeachment Senate Trial Constitutional Law Trump Presidency January 6 Attack
Read more →

Supreme Court Dismisses All Trump Emoluments Cases as Moot

| Importance: 6/10

Supreme Court dismissed all three pending emoluments clause lawsuits against Trump as moot after he left office, including CREW v. Trump, DC/Maryland v. Trump, and Blumenthal v. Trump (200+ Democratic members of Congress). The Court vacated lower court decisions that had allowed cases to proceed, …

US Supreme Court Donald Trump CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) District of Columbia Maryland +1 more emoluments supreme-court constitutional-law judicial-dismissal accountability-failure
Read more →

Pelosi Transmits Impeachment Article to Senate After Biden Inauguration

| Importance: 9/10

On January 25, 2021, exactly two weeks after the House voted to impeach Donald Trump and five days after President Biden’s inauguration, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi transmitted the single article of impeachment—charging Trump with “incitement of insurrection”—to the Senate. The nine …

Nancy Pelosi Jamie Raskin Chuck Schumer Mitch McConnell House Impeachment Managers Trump Presidency Impeachment January 6 Attack Senate Trial Constitutional Law
Read more →

Mueller Warns Charging a Sitting President is Constitutionally Prohibited

| Importance: 9/10

Special Counsel Robert Mueller publicly clarified his investigation\u0027s constraints, stating that DOJ policy prohibits charging a sitting president with a federal crime. Mueller emphasized that \u0027under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while …

Robert Mueller William Barr constitutional-law robert-mueller trump-investigation legal-constraints doj-policy
Read more →

Federal Judge Rules NSA Bulk Phone Data Collection Likely Unconstitutional

| Importance: 9/10

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon ruled in Klayman v. Obama that the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of American telephone metadata likely violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. In a strongly-worded 68-page opinion, Judge Leon …

Richard Leon NSA Larry Klayman nsa-surveillance fourth-amendment judicial-oversight constitutional-law privacy-rights
Read more →

FISA Court Judge Rejects NSA Warrantless Surveillance Expansion

| Importance: 8/10

FISA Court Judge Roger Vinson delivered a significant rebuke to the Bush administration by rejecting the government’s attempt to rewrite FISA statutes to permit expanded warrantless surveillance inside the United States. The government sought to stretch FISA’s definition of a …

Roger Vinson FISA Court NSA Bush Administration Department of Justice fisa-court judicial-rebuke warrantless-surveillance fourth-amendment constitutional-law +1 more
Read more →

Boland Amendment Explicitly Prohibits All U.S. Funding for Contras

| Importance: 9/10

Congress passes the most restrictive version of the Boland Amendment, explicitly prohibiting any U.S. government agency involved in intelligence activities from providing support for military or paramilitary operations in Nicaragua. The amendment, effective from October 3, 1984, to December 3, 1985, …

Edward Boland Ronald Reagan Iran-Contra congressional-oversight Nicaragua Reagan-administration constitutional-law
Read more →