Felon Disenfranchisement Expansion: States Tighten Voting Bans as Prison Population Explodes
Throughout the 1990s, as the prison population exploded due to War on Drugs policies and “tough on crime” legislation, states expanded and entrenched felon disenfranchisement laws, creating a new form of mass voter exclusion that disproportionately impacted Black and Latino communities. By 1997, an estimated 3.9 million Americans were disenfranchised due to criminal convictions—a number that would nearly double over the following decade.
The expansion of felon disenfranchisement represented the convergence of two trends: mass incarceration driven by mandatory minimums, three-strikes laws, and drug war enforcement, and deliberate policy choices to strip voting rights from those caught in the system. While some states had always imposed voting bans on felons, the 1990s saw new restrictions and resistance to reform even as incarceration rates skyrocketed.
Several states tightened restrictions. Utah eliminated automatic restoration of voting rights upon completion of sentence. Massachusetts, through a 2000 ballot initiative, stripped voting rights from incarcerated felons after a campaign emphasizing that prisoners might vote for “soft on crime” candidates. Alabama, facing court challenges, defended its constitutional provision explicitly rooted in post-Reconstruction Black disenfranchisement.
The racial disparities were stark and intentional. Black Americans were incarcerated at nearly seven times the rate of whites, meaning that race-neutral felony disenfranchisement laws produced deeply racially skewed outcomes. In several states, more than one in four Black men were disenfranchised. The laws’ origins in post-Civil War efforts to circumvent the Fifteenth Amendment remained evident in their effects.
ALEC and conservative state policy networks resisted reform efforts, promoting model legislation to maintain strict disenfranchisement. Arguments for felony voting bans—claims about protecting ballot integrity or punishing wrongdoing—echoed the same justifications used for poll taxes and literacy tests. The policies functioned as part of a broader criminal justice system that filtered the electorate by race and class.
By 2000, an estimated 4.7 million Americans were disenfranchised, including 1.8 million who had completed all aspects of their sentences but remained permanently barred from voting in states without automatic restoration. In Florida alone, 1.4 million citizens—disproportionately Black—were excluded from voting, a fact that would prove decisive in the 2000 presidential election decided by just 537 votes.
Key Actors
Sources (16)
- Felony Disenfranchisement in the United States [Tier 1]
- Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy [Tier 2]
- The Politics of Felon Disenfranchisement [Tier 2]
- TIMELINE: A long history of abuse by Dr. Larry Nassar (2018-01-24) [Tier 1]
- USA Gymnastics sex abuse scandal (2024-01-01) [Tier 2]
- Larry Nassar (2024-01-01) [Tier 2]
- Financial Deregulation, U.S. Party Politics, and Rising Income Inequality (2013-11-01) [Tier 1]
- Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system (1999-11-01) [Tier 2]
- Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Sector Summary (2024) [Tier 1]
- On financial deregulation, GOP repeating history (2016-04-20) [Tier 2]
- Koch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine
- Koch Climate Opposition Funding
- Who Funds Contrariness on Climate Change?
- Investigation of the SEC's Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford's Alleged Ponzi Scheme [Tier 1]
- The Stanford Ponzi Scheme: Lessons for Protecting Investors from the Next Securities Fraud [Tier 1]
- The Stanford Ponzi Scheme: Lessons for Protecting Investors (Testimony by Robert Khuzami and Carlo di Florio) (2011-05-13) [Tier 1]
Help Improve This Timeline
Found an error or have additional information? You can help improve this event.
Edit: Opens GitHub editor to submit corrections or improvements via pull request.
Suggest: Opens a GitHub issue to propose a new event for the timeline.