A federal judge declined to block Trump’s elimination of over 1,600 National Science Foundation grants worth $1 billion, despite Congress having explicitly appropriated and authorized the funding. The cuts, pushed by unauthorized DOGE operatives operating outside legal channels, specifically …
Donald TrumpDOGENational Science FoundationFederal Judiciaryinstitutional-capturecongressional-power-usurpationscientific-research-sabotagediscrimination
Federal Judge Matthew Brann ruled that Trump lawyer Alina Habba has been exercising the functions and duties of U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey without lawful authority since July 1, 2025. After the Senate failed to confirm Habba before her 120-day interim appointment expired, a panel …
TrumpAlina HabbaDepartment of JusticeFederal Judiciaryinstitutional-capturerule-of-lawexecutive-overreachconstitutional-crisis
According to Washington Post analysis, the Trump administration has been accused of flouting courts in about a third of more than 160 lawsuits where judges issued substantive rulings against them. CNN reports the administration is “at war with the federal judiciary,” evading court orders …
Trump AdministrationFederal JudiciaryU.S. District Judge James BoasbergU.S. District Judge John McConnellJudge Paula Xinisconstitutional-crisiscourt-defiancerule-of-law-breakdownsystematic-non-compliancejudicial-authority+1 more
The Justice Department used legally dubious tactics to bypass Senate confirmation, re-designating Trump loyalists as ‘acting’ U.S. attorneys in New Jersey, Nevada, California, and New York. After district judges declined to re-appoint certain interim appointees, Attorney General Pam …
Department of JusticePam BondiU.S. SenateFederal JudiciaryAlina Habba+2 moreinstitutional-capturedojjudiciaryconstitutional-crisis
Judicial Conference approved groundbreaking protocols for responding to systematic executive branch noncompliance, including accelerated contempt procedures, enhanced judicial protection measures, and a coordinated inter-district response strategy to preserve judicial review powers. The 2025 …
Federal JudiciaryJudicial ConferenceAdministrative Office of U.S. CourtsDepartment of Justicejudicial-reformconstitutional-crisisinstitutional-resilienceexecutive-oversightjudicial-accountability
A consortium of constitutional law experts published a comprehensive analysis revealing systematic undermining of judicial review processes. The report documented unprecedented instances of executive branch noncompliance with court orders, highlighting a critical breakdown in the traditional checks …
Constitutional Law ScholarsFederal JudiciaryExecutive BranchAmanda FrostKristin Hickmanjudicial-reviewconstitutional-crisisseparation-of-powersaccountability
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a critical hearing investigating unprecedented threats to judicial independence in 2025, documenting rising levels of violence, intimidation, disinformation, and defiance of lawful court judgments. Testimony revealed a disturbing pattern of physical threats, …
The Trump administration initiated unprecedented moves to remove federal judges deemed obstructionist, invoking rarely used judicial review procedures. Multiple federal circuit courts issued emergency injunctions, creating a complex legal standoff that threatened judicial independence and separation …
Trump AdministrationFederal JudiciaryDepartment of JusticeWhite House Press Secretary Karoline Leavittjudicial-independenceconstitutional-crisisexecutive-overreachfederal-judiciaryseparation-of-powers
In a landmark series of rulings spanning multiple federal appeals courts and culminating on April 10, 2025, federal judges significantly reaffirmed and expanded legal frameworks for holding the executive branch accountable. The decisions centered on critical constitutional issues including …
Federal JudiciarySupreme CourtDepartment of JusticeRebecca SlaughterLisa Cook+2 morepresidential-accountabilityconstitutional-crisisjudicial-reviewlegal-precedentexecutive-power+1 more
A consolidated panel of federal judges heard critical arguments challenging the president’s authority to federalize and deploy National Guard units across multiple states. The hearings revealed profound constitutional tensions surrounding emergency powers, state sovereignty, and executive …
Federal JudiciaryNational GuardState GovernorsExecutive BranchU.S. District Judge Karin Immergut+4 morenational-guardconstitutional-crisismilitary-authorityseparation-of-powersexecutive-overreach+2 more
Chief Justice John Roberts led a critical federal judicial conference highlighting unprecedented challenges to judicial independence. Roberts warned about four major threats: escalating violence against judges, intimidation tactics, disinformation spread through social media, and potential political …
Chief Justice John RobertsChief Judge James BoasbergFederal JudiciarySupreme CourtU.S. Marshals Servicejudicial-independenceconstitutional-crisisseparation-of-powersjudicial-securityrule-of-law
In a landmark series of cases, federal courts grappled with complex emoluments clause violations by the Trump administration. Multiple district and appellate courts issued conflicting rulings, exposing deep systemic challenges in holding executive branch officials accountable for foreign financial …
Federal JudiciaryTrump AdministrationDepartment of JusticeSupreme Courtconstitutional-crisisemolumentsjudicial-reviewseparation-of-powers
Trump administration launched systematic executive orders targeting law firms, mass firings of prosecutors, and open defiance of court rulings, creating what legal scholars describe as unprecedented constitutional crisis.